Philadelphia Mayor Cherelle Parker’s hiring decisions are drawing attention after several appointments of former elected officials with legal troubles or past controversies.
While some see these moves as offering second chances, others question whether the administration is prioritizing loyalty over qualifications.
One of the most talked-about hires is Kevin Boyle, a former state representative who stepped down last year under what the Philadelphia Inquirer described as “extraordinary circumstances.”
His family had publicly raised concerns about his well-being before his departure.
Now, he’s serving as a deputy director of external affairs in the managing director’s office, making $110,000 a year—more than a state representative’s base salary.
Boyle isn’t the only figure with a complicated past to land a role in Parker’s administration.
In November, Parker hired three former elected officials with criminal records.
Former state representative Movita Johnson-Harrell, convicted of theft and perjury for stealing $500,000 from a nonprofit, was hired as a public information officer for the sheriff’s department with a $75,000 salary.
Leslie Acosta, another former state representative, pleaded guilty to money laundering conspiracy and is now in a community outreach role at the Department of Commerce, earning $70,000.
Former Traffic Court Judge Willie Singletary, who was removed from the bench in 2011 for sexual harassment and later convicted of lying to the FBI about a ticket-fixing scheme, was appointed as a deputy director in the managing director’s office.
Parker’s administration says these hires reflect a commitment to rehabilitation and second chances.
Supporters argue that people who have served their legal penalties should be able to move forward in their careers.
Critics, however, question whether these appointments are about redemption or political loyalty.
Transparency is also an issue. When The Inquirer asked whether Boyle’s position was publicly advertised or if he had submitted a resume, the mayor’s office did not respond.
The absence of a response has left questions about the hiring process.